What do you think?

[R23]

What an epic way to lead in ETIAW. Wow, I'm now listening to it like it was the first time I heard it. Love it.

[adrian2425]

love it!!!!!!!!!!!

[WeddingDom]

I really was expecting this song, but it's pointless, imo :nod:

[James.]

it does sound like the intro they used at the festivals! it definitely makes the beginning of ETIAW a lot less sudden, which I like :)

[beingme_94]

awesome intro !! listening to the whole album now

[Nature]

just stupid.

[JM-SP2]

good way to make a transition between UATW and ETIAW, works perfectly.

[Hartroc]

Should have just been part of Every Teardrop, instead of its own track. :nod:

Mildly interesting.

[lifeincoldplaycolor]

it was played at live festivals so its nothing new lol a good way to introduce ETIAW

[Guppywarlord]

It's reminiscent of the intro to Where the Streets Have No Name...hmm.

[the_escapist]

very alike to the introduction of Where the Streets Have No Name from U2....

[foxeh]

Makes me like ETIAW even more.

[golfing7861]

Amazing intro, makes ETIAW even better!!!

[Blockflote]

I really like it. There are some tiny weird sounds.. Great!

[Famous Old Painter]

Should have just been part of Every Teardrop, instead of its own track. :nod:

Mildly interesting.
I suspect it was at one point, hence all those early reports of ETIAW having a long intro.

I've just attached all the interludes to their parents tracks with audio editing software so my version of MX is 11 songs long. MMIX makes ETIAW sound a bit better and more interesting, but doesn't add a whole lot.

Certainly undeserving of it's own track.

[Juanma]

Amazing intro, makes ETIAW even better!!!

this!

[R23]

I suspect it was at one point, hence all those early reports of ETIAW having a long intro.

I've just attached all the interludes to their parents tracks with audio editing software so my version of MX is 11 songs long. MMIX makes ETIAW sound a bit better and more interesting, but doesn't add a whole lot.

Certainly undeserving of it's own track.
I think it's sounds amazing. It feels like it's really building up for ETIAW. I wish they had added MMIX to the intro of ETIAW when it was released as a single. I don't know, I love the song much more now. It made me think of the Violet Hill intro, which really sets the mood while you haven't heard Chris sing a word.

[Jack1505]

Should have just been part of Every Teardrop, instead of its own track. :nod:

Mildly interesting.

This!

[mrman78]

I think the instrumentals being separated out are basically an artistic move more than anything else. I think if they were part of the tracks they lead into, people would complain the intros to the songs were too long!

[Felicci]

If you listen too it alone, without ETIAW after, it must be the most pointless song being put on an album ever...

[Schröder]

^ That's why you have to listen to the album in its entirety. :shame:

Btw, I think the track is slightly too long.

[l0wxo2]

I don't really care for it :\

[Harondor]

It should have been mixed with ETIAW, actually like MX and HLH. It introduces ETIAW brillantly

[grids]

m.m.i.x is just the opening of the song before every teardrop is a waterfall.

[QuestionsOfScience]

Even without ETIAW it's still a nice song, a bit on the similar lines as Treefingers by Radiohead from Kid A, just a little ambient piece as an interlude. I love it, I'd love to hear an extended version, I'd just listen to that alone, same with A Hopeful Transmission! :L

[Drew42LP5]

It doesn't deserve it's own track.

[Abracadabra]

It doesn't deserve it's own track.

Definitely.

[Cheese Nip 2]

I think the fact that the "intros" are not attached to the following song is so you listen to the album as a whole (like it would work if you just had it ob shuffle or whatever). I heard an interview with Guy where he said they did Viva like that too (with the hidden tracks).

[TecHniCoLoR_MX]

idk...im trying to post on every MX song thread...