PDA

View Full Version : Studio vs Live

busybeeburns
06-12-2003, 03:06 AM
No particular artists, which would you prefer to sit back and chill to?

(both A+ quality of course ;))
mycdplayerisbroke
06-12-2003, 03:37 AM
live of course

a few times of studio and its like hmmm what now?
with coldplay for example the beginning of politik its like he's always yelling something new or shouting something funny out to the crowd
i love it
Danilo
06-12-2003, 04:11 AM
That depends of the band, some bands are better in studio, however others are better live. I particularly think that in studio it's cool, it's a thing more "mysterious" and live it's totally different, you can to see the expression on the face of out singer, the energy of the band, you can also test the band. Live it's live.

sorry for the english :/
mycdplayerisbroke
06-12-2003, 04:14 AM
the beatles were a studio band
Danilo
06-12-2003, 04:34 AM
the beatles were a studio band

You is Beatles fans?
CityandColour
06-12-2003, 04:47 AM
It honestly depends how the band is live, like Incubus, they are fucking spectacular live. It should be played exactly like it was on the album, no changes on the song when being performed live whatsoever. I'd still go with Studio though, with some exceptions....
mycdplayerisbroke
06-12-2003, 08:26 AM
ou is Beatles fans?


who isnt
CityandColour
06-12-2003, 09:00 AM
I like the Beatles but like I said, I prefer Zepp... or the Who... AC/DC...
Kettercat
06-12-2003, 11:09 AM
Studio!!!
Live in nice but arggghh I'd take studio any day. :smug:
Professor Peedston
06-12-2003, 06:39 PM
well, since you phrased it as "to sit back and chill to," i'm going with studio.
fifi
06-12-2003, 07:15 PM
I prefer live because all the bands i've seen live have always sounded better than they do on cd :)
Jewel
06-12-2003, 07:45 PM
live :wink3:
Corner Kid
06-12-2003, 09:39 PM
it depends, both provide a different experience. Some live songs sound better than the recording (if you're there at the performance), and some live songs let you down. Live songs ON recording is a different story, in that case, I'd pick studio, merely for the quality of the recording. But when its "live" as in "being there" I'd pick both.
Danilo
07-12-2003, 12:56 AM
ou is Beatles fans?


who isnt

I'm not, but respect their work, I know what they means for music.
CityandColour
07-12-2003, 01:00 AM
One example of a band that is dissapointing live.... Default, they're great in the studio but live, Dallas Smith can't sing for shit, which is sad.
Danilo
07-12-2003, 01:14 AM
One example of a band that is dissapointing live.... Default, they're great in the studio but live, Dallas Smith can't sing for shit, which is sad.

Hey, I saw your signature with a part of the lyrics of It's So Easy, you like GN'R?
CityandColour
07-12-2003, 01:19 AM
Naw, not really... I don't hate them either though. I just been on a small kick of GN'R's, Appetite for Destruction album since last night.
mycdplayerisbroke
07-12-2003, 01:31 AM
when you first start out hearing a band you have to hear the studio
just to get 'adjusted'
then you can move on to bigger and better such as live
Corner Kid
07-12-2003, 09:24 AM
when you first start out hearing a band you have to hear the studio
just to get 'adjusted'
then you can move on to bigger and better such as live

a lot of times, I see an artist blow away an audience with their live performances, but then I go home and download the studio songs, which turn out to be shit. I see a lot of artists here in atlanta who are like that, they'll go up on stage and deliver this charismatic performance and exude so much stage presence, and everyone loves it, but if they really sat there and listened solely to the song, they wouldnt be nearly as impressed.